|
Home
History
Environmental Threat
Site Characterization
Plant Wastes
Contamination Threat Modes
Residuals - Components
Sources of MGP Liquid Effluent
FMG Plants in the US
Parallel MG Technologies
Think you've found a gas works?
Locating & Confirming a Site
Locations of US Gas Plants
FMGP In The News
FMGP In The Arts
Related sites on the Internet
Literature of Manufactured Gas
Publications by Dr. Hatheway
Slide Show Archive
Hatheway Bio
Hatheway Resume
| |

Gas Manufacturing
Processes
It is well proven that artificial gas can be manufactured from literally
any organic matter. Coal has been the favorite feedstock because of its
abundance in those portions of the temperate climates where the
industrial revolution was able to take place, largely due to steam
energy produced from the burning of coal. The main historic processes of
gas manufacture are discussed in this section of the website.
To Page #2 -
TREATMENT COMPONENTS of the GAS
PLANT
 |
|
Coal-Gas
Retort Bench
Coal-gas Retorts were made in the general configuration shown, and, after
about 1880 generally came as a solid ceramic tube of a Dee cross-section
as a measure to avoid stress-prevalent sharp corners. Retorts
experienced thermal damage from the typical four-to-six hour charge
cycles and commonly needed replacement within months to two years.
Most plant sites will be found somewhat littered with broken retort
fragments and bricks stripped from aged Bench housings, the which
provided the heat-conserving support structure and the by-pass
flues to heat the retorts in the absence of oxygen. Riser Pipes
are here labeled Gas Off take Pipes. This is a Bench of Eights,
more common to the United Kingdom, and sharing a single Furnace.
Furnaces were fed by coal, by coke raked from the retorts on completion
of each gas run, and sometimes supplemented by flowing tar recovered
at various points in the Clarification Process. It is best not
to assume that plant tar residuals were consumed in any degree
unless backed by reliable plant or company records (Artwork by
Robin Snyder, Gas Works Illustrator; rsnyder@aol.com) (click on
the image for a larger version of this image).
|
BROWN'S DIRECTORY of AMERICAN GAS COMPANIES
 |
| Brown's Directory began publication in 1887 as a yearly
compendium of organizational and process- oriented information
solicited by the publisher, on a voluntary basis, from the
nation's manufactured gas companies. Being of a voluntary basis,
the Directory was always at the mercy of the correspondents as
to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of submissions. The
Directory has changed ownership several times, mainly later in
its ongoing history, and is published yet today. Five years are
missing from the series (never published) in the 1890s and the
content and organization of the Directory varies considerably by
the year. A major shortcoming of the Directory is that gas
companies with multiple gasworks in the same city are
indistinguishable as to the number and location of individual
plants and of the individual yearly production for multiple
gasworks under the same ownership. One of the techniques of
assessing the toxicity threat of gas plant sites is to compute
the total volumes of expected gas-manufacturing residuals and
wastes, as a function of the yearly production of gas at each
gasworks. Fortunately, the production figures for single-plant
companies generally are to be found in these directories.
|
 |
|
Carburetted Water Gas Plant (Post-1900)
This outstanding method of gas-manufacturing was invented by T.S.C.
Lowe, one of America's truly outstanding engineering geniuses.
This process diagram begins on the left, with the three cylindrical
Generator units of the system, developed and patented in 1875,
to utilize coke as a reactor bed in the Generator, with steam
injected, from the Boiler, into the Generator, then passed to
the Carburetor for injection of light petroleum oils (for gas
light illumination) and then into the Superheater, where more
checker-board fire bricks retained heat to flash the composite
gas into a fixed nature, followed by a Wash Box seal to pass the
raw gas through a Tar Separator, and Scrubber, then into the Relief
Holder (serving a pressure-equalization role far different from
the Relief Holder of coal-gas plants). From this position the
gas went on to experience a Condenser, an Exhauster, another Tar
Extractor, and, finally, the purifier boxes, then the Station
Meter and a Storage Holder identical for what was required at
coal-gas plants. In fact, make use of this illustration for superior
details to those shown for the coal-gas plant. A single three-unit
Generator Set, of three cylinders, could make much more gas per
day than could coal-gas benches, in addition, saving on labor
and operating space in the Generator House. One major flaw came
into being as coke became scarce after 1910 and, at the same time,
motor vehicle fuel sales crowded the usual light gas oils off the
market and CWG plants were forced to substitute coals as inferior
reactor feedstock and to carburet with inferior heavier-weight
oils. On the West Coast, the situation grew worse earlier, forcing
the use of crude oils and the production of equally inferior tar-water
emulsions as well as lampblack (soot). Generally speaking coal-gas
tar carried less than 4-6 percent water, while CWG tar-water emulsions
reach as much as 90 percent water. Buyers of tar-water emulsions
were nearly non-existent and huge amounts of this non-salable
wastes were consigned to the environment as a management option
by many plant operators. Today their presence should be expected
as hazardous wastes.
|
 |
|
Carburetted
Water Gas Plant, Paducah, Kentucky
(ca. 1925)
By the early
1900s, the standard brick manufactured gas plant had given way
to a steel-framed brick-facade generator building of slightly
taller nature, to accommodate the usual two-story layout of carburetted
water gas. This plant, built on contract by the Stone & Webster
Engineering Corporation (SWEC; Founded 1889, at Boston, Massachusetts,
and owners, builders, and operators of many manufactured gas plants
and yet in business as a subsidiary of The Shaw Companies), has
the typical operator's floor above, with the bases of the generator
set cylinders extending upward from the ground floor. The traditional
monitor-style factor roof ridge is a preferred holdover from 19th century architectural
tradition and promotes ventilation on hot days. A newer above-ground
gas holder lies to the right rear and an obviously older gas holder
is seen to the left, probably serving as the relief holder to
buffer the pressure waves associated with moving from blow cycle
to run cycle, every few minutes. (Photo from undated SWEC sales
brochure of ca. 1925).
|
 |
|
U.G.I.
1890 Version Of T.S.C. Lowe's Carburetted Water Gas Plant T.S.C.
Lowe sold
his basic carburetted water gas patents to the United Gas Improvement
Company, of Philadelphia, in 1884, just two years after its founding.
Lowe shortly moved west, to Pasadena, California, and became a
leading civic, gas manufacturing personality, and developer of
public attractions in Southern California. His base patents began
to expire about 1892 and CWG units began to appear as marketed
by other than U.G.I., notably the Gas Machinery Company
(Cleveland), Bartlett-Hayward Company (Baltimore), Gas Engineering
Co. (Trenton), Western Gas Construction Co. (Ft. Wayne, IN), Koppers Co.
(Pittsburgh), and West Gas Improvement Co., of Britain. The term
"water gas" was used loosely throughout the gas era, even in Brown's
Directory of North American Gas Companies, and should be question-factored
into site and waste characterization studies. This view, from
an 1890 U.G.I. sales brochure portrays a single Generator Set
of, from left to right, Generator, Carburetor, and Double Superheater,
followed, on the right, by the Wash Box and two cylindrical Scrubber
towers. Separated tar wastes were plumbed to transfer below the
floor of this two story gas house. Note that there is a typical
factory-type smoke stack at the boiler, with the blow-fume
cylindrical chimney above the superheater shell.
|
 |
|
Combination
Coal-Gas And Carburetted Water Gas Plant (ca. 1925)
As noted
above, an ideal combinational mix of gas manufacturing equipment
was to generate gas and coke via coal-gas machines and to employ
the coke for general plant heating of boilers and gas-making furnaces,
then to employ the coke also as the reactor bed for the carburetted
water gas generator sets. This design, by Stone & Webster, at
Pawtucket, Rhode Island shows the related layout (Photo from an
undated SWEC sales brochure of ca. 1925).
|
 |
|
Hancock
(Ripley), Michigan
Ruins of
the FMGP at Hancock (Ripley), Michigan, a plant built for coal-gas
generation and expanded to include carburetted water gas (CWG).
There was a certain symbiosis in this dual operational capacity,
in the years after widespread availability of CWG equipment (from
the United Gas Improvement Company, of Philadelphia, purchasers
of T.S.C. Lowe's patents in 1884) and before 1910, when coke produced
at the coal-gas plant could be used to fire the plant boilers,
to fire the furnace below the retort benches, and to serve as
the feedstock-reactant bed of the CWG sets.
|
 |
|
Loomis
Gas Producer (From Miller, 1910)
Gas Producers
make up the forgotten bulk of American coal-tar sites. This technology
produced "Blue" Water Gas, that is fuel gas made from coke or
nearly any other organic matter, to thermally disassociate superheated
steam into hydrogen gas (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO), both combustible
at low Btu and without illumination qualities. The technology
was suggested in Belgium in 1832 and pioneered in Britain in the
1850s by Sir William Siemens and perfected about 1861. Producer
gas truly came into its own, in the U.S. about 1890 and continued
in force until supplanted here and there by newly-arriving natural
gas, mainly after 1930 and through 1960. Plants were installed
in all manner of factories, in nearly every industry, especially
those requiring heat. Factory owners bought the machines directly
from manufacturers and operated them with plant personnel. Tars
were generated and clarified and normally the waste waters and
their tars were handled by options chosen by the factory management.
There were hundreds of manufacturers across the nation. Patents
were dodged in many ways, leading to the proliferation of designs.
Shown is a Loomis Gas Producer, one of the leading varieties,
as produced by the Loomis-Pettibone Company of New York City,
NY.
"Bituminous
coal contains a large amount of tarry vapors formed by the hydrocarbons,
which condense on coming into contact with cold surfaces, and
if these are drawn through an incandescent bed they add still
further to the combustible ... If the tar cannot be so treated,
it must be washed out of the gas together with the dust, water
vapor, and the uncombined carbon dioxide." J.B. Rathbun, Consulting
Gas Engineer, Chicago, IL, in Gas Engine Troubles and Installation,
1911.
|
 |
|
Producer
Gas Engine
(Nash, Three-Cylinder Variety, ca. 1911)
Producer
gas engines were the preferred power transfer medium for producer
gas, here shown, in the center of the view (blue color), as driving
an electric-generating D.C. dynamo (red color) and powered directly
from the adjacent gas producer (green color). Normally, the entire
gas producer set would be equipped with a condensing and washing
tar removal device, with tar-bearing effluent sent through the
floor and into some form of waste transport channel or sewer (Artwork
by Ms. Robin Snyder, Gas Works Illustrator; rsnyder@aol.com).
|
 |
|
Coke
Works, St. Louis, Missouri 1950
Low oblique
aerial photograph of the Laclede Gas Light & Coke Company utility
byproduct coke plant at Carondelet District of South St. Louis,
Missouri. This configuration was the result of some modifications
to the 1914 plant, built as an economic investment just prior
to the start of World War I, in Europe. The entire site today
measures about 16 ha. and lies at the juncture of the Mississippi
River (top view) and the River des Peres, a major stormwater channel
(shown to the right) of St. Louis. The site is geologically complex
and contains karst features, an open tar pond, and an 1872-1905
coal-gas plant (not shown, but lying at the extreme west edge,
beyond the lower edge of this view, along Broadway Blvd). The plant
was abandoned by its third owner in 1987 and is the property of
the St. Louis Community Redevelopment Authority and under a VCP
order to its original builder. Historic activities that have gone
on at this site include the first European settlement west of
the Mississippi River (Tamaroa, 1700-1703; portions of riverboat
Captain James B. Eads' Union Army gunboat works (1862-1865) ,
Carondelet Gas Light Company (1872-1905), the world-class Vulcan
Steel Mill (1870-1888) and Balloon Training School V of the United
States Army Signal Corps (1917-1918).
|
 |
|
Koppers
Direct Ammonia Recovery Plant (Post-1910)
Heinrich
Koppers, a premier German gas engineer, emigrated to the United
States in 1908 and enjoyed a brief but spectacular career in
design of by-product coke ovens before his return to his native
country in 1914, as a victim of the outbreak of the great European
war. He sold his prosperous engineering company to Pittsburgh financiers
headed by J.P. Morgan. The Koppers name became the leader in coke
by-product plant design and much of the ongoing research in technologies
for ever more efficient production of manufactured gas and of
coal-tar by-products. The firm expanded into all aspects of the
coal-tar chemical industry and provided the basis technology for
production of synthetic rubber under the terrifying early days
of World War II, with the loss of Asia to the Japanese. The Koppers
firm eventually bankrupted under pressure of its numerous
environmental remediation obligations. Shown is a late Koppers plant design for direct
recovery of ammonia from a by-product coke-oven plant (click on
the image for a larger version of this scanned image).
|
To Page #2 -
TREATMENT COMPONENTS of the GAS
PLANT
|
Visitors |
|